fair-rose
fair-rose7mo ago

Property 'field' does not exist on type 'CrudFilter'.

const [filterState, setFilterState] = useState<string | undefined>(""); useEffect(() => { setFilters((prevFilters) => { if (filterState === "pending") { console.log("Previous Filters:", prevFilters); return [ ...prevFilters, { field: "status", operator: "eq", value: filterState, }, ]; } else { return prevFilters.filter(filter => filter.field !== "status"); } }); }, [filterState]); Property 'field' does not exist on type 'CrudFilter'. Property 'field' does not exist on type 'ConditionalFilter'.ts(2339) Even though the value of prevFilters is as follows: [ { "field": "title", "operator": "eq", "value": "Test Title" }, { "field": "status", "operator": "eq", "value": "pending" } ]
15 Replies
kapa.ai
kapa.ai7mo ago
Hi @obelisk291. I'm kapa.ai, your friendly support bot. I will try to answer your question by searching through the knowledge base. :wave: ---------------------- The error you're encountering, "Property 'field' does not exist on type 'CrudFilter'," is due to the fact that the CrudFilter type does not include a field property. According to the provided knowledge sources, CrudFilter can be either a LogicalFilter or a ConditionalFilter. From the knowledge sources, we have the following definitions: - CrudFilter is defined as LogicalFilter | ConditionalFilter (source (https://refine.dev/docs/core/interface-references/#crudfilter)). - ConditionalFilter does not have a field property; it has key, operator, and value properties (source (https://refine.dev/docs/core/interface-references/#conditionalfilter)). Given this, it seems like you might be trying to use a LogicalFilter instead. However, the exact structure of LogicalFilter is not provided in the knowledge sources. To resolve this issue, you need to ensure that the filter object you are trying to add matches the structure of either LogicalFilter or ConditionalFilter. Since the field property is not part of ConditionalFilter, you might need to adjust your filter logic accordingly. Here is a revised version of your code that avoids using the field property:
const [filterState, setFilterState] = useState<string | undefined>("");

useEffect(() => {
setFilters((prevFilters) => {
if (filterState === "pending") {
console.log("Previous Filters:", prevFilters);
return [
...prevFilters,
{
key: "status",
operator: "eq",
value: filterState,
},
];
} else {
return prevFilters.filter(filter => filter.key !== "status");
}
});
}, [filterState]);
const [filterState, setFilterState] = useState<string | undefined>("");

useEffect(() => {
setFilters((prevFilters) => {
if (filterState === "pending") {
console.log("Previous Filters:", prevFilters);
return [
...prevFilters,
{
key: "status",
operator: "eq",
value: filterState,
},
];
} else {
return prevFilters.filter(filter => filter.key !== "status");
}
});
}, [filterState]);
In this code, I replaced field with key to match the ConditionalFilter structure. If LogicalFilter is more appropriate for your use case, you will need to refer to its structure and adjust accordingly. For more details, you can refer to the CrudFilter documentation (https://refine.dev/docs/core/interface-references/#crudfilter) and the ConditionalFilter documentation (https://refine.dev/docs/core/interface-references/#conditionalfilter). If you need further clarification on LogicalFilter, you might need to consult additional refine documentation or resources. ---------------------- Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon: ----------------------
kapa.ai
kapa.ai7mo ago
<@1257731147509661728> kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let us know how it did by reacting below
fair-rose
fair-roseOP7mo ago
@kapa.ai as I said before, the value of prevFilters is the following: [ { "field": "test", "operator": "eq", "value": "test" }, { "field": "status", "operator": "eq", "value": "pending" } ] There is no key property. Field is definitely a property of whatever type of object this is @kapa.ai as I said before, the value of prevFilters is the following: [ { "field": "test", "operator": "eq", "value": "test" }, { "field": "status", "operator": "eq", "value": "pending" } ] There is no key property. Field is definitely a property of whatever type of object this is @kapa.ai as I said before, the value of prevFilters is the following: [ { "field": "test", "operator": "eq", "value": "test" }, { "field": "status", "operator": "eq", "value": "pending" } ] There is no key property. Field is definitely a property of whatever type of object this is
kapa.ai
kapa.ai7mo ago
Let me check the knowledge base for you. One moment! :books: ---------------------- Given that the prevFilters array contains objects with a field property, it seems there might be a discrepancy between the type definitions and the actual objects being used in your application. Since the provided knowledge sources do not explicitly define a field property for CrudFilter, but your application clearly uses it, you might be dealing with a custom type or an extended version of CrudFilter. To resolve the TypeScript error, you can create a custom type that includes the field property and use it in your state and effect hook. Here’s how you can define a custom type and update your code accordingly:
type CustomFilter = {
field: string;
operator: string;
value: any;
};

const [filterState, setFilterState] = useState<string | undefined>("");

useEffect(() => {
setFilters((prevFilters: CustomFilter[]) => {
if (filterState === "pending") {
console.log("Previous Filters:", prevFilters);
return [
...prevFilters,
{
field: "status",
operator: "eq",
value: filterState,
},
];
} else {
return prevFilters.filter(filter => filter.field !== "status");
}
});
}, [filterState]);
type CustomFilter = {
field: string;
operator: string;
value: any;
};

const [filterState, setFilterState] = useState<string | undefined>("");

useEffect(() => {
setFilters((prevFilters: CustomFilter[]) => {
if (filterState === "pending") {
console.log("Previous Filters:", prevFilters);
return [
...prevFilters,
{
field: "status",
operator: "eq",
value: filterState,
},
];
} else {
return prevFilters.filter(filter => filter.field !== "status");
}
});
}, [filterState]);
In this code: - We define a CustomFilter type that includes the field, operator, and value properties. - We use this CustomFilter type in the useEffect hook to ensure TypeScript recognizes the field property. This should resolve the TypeScript error and allow you to continue using the field property in your filter objects. If you need further details on the CrudFilter type, you might want to consult additional refine documentation or resources. ---------------------- Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon: ----------------------
kapa.ai
kapa.ai7mo ago
<@1257731147509661728> kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let us know how it did by reacting below
fair-rose
fair-roseOP7mo ago
@kapa.ai No overload matches this call. Overload 1 of 2, '(filters: CrudFilter[], behavior?: SetFilterBehavior | undefined): void', gave the following error. Argument of type '(prevFilters: CustomFilter[]) => CustomFilter[]' is not assignable to parameter of type 'CrudFilter[]'. Overload 2 of 2, '(setter: (prevFilters: CrudFilter[]) => CrudFilter[]): void', gave the following error. Argument of type '(prevFilters: CustomFilter[]) => CustomFilter[]' is not assignable to parameter of type '(prevFilters: CrudFilter[]) => CrudFilter[]'. Types of parameters 'prevFilters' and 'prevFilters' are incompatible. Type 'CrudFilter[]' is not assignable to type 'CustomFilter[]'. Type 'CrudFilter' is not assignable to type 'CustomFilter'. Property 'field' is missing in type 'ConditionalFilter' but required in type 'CustomFilter'.ts(2769) filter.ts(2, 5): 'field' is declared here.
kapa.ai
kapa.ai7mo ago
Let me check the knowledge base for you. One moment! :books: ---------------------- The error you're encountering is due to the type mismatch between CrudFilter and your custom CustomFilter. Since CrudFilter does not include a field property, but your application requires it, you need to ensure that the type definitions align correctly. To resolve this, you can extend the CrudFilter type to include the field property. Here’s how you can define an extended type and update your code accordingly:
import { CrudFilter } from 'path-to-crudfilter-definition'; // Adjust the import path as necessary

interface CustomFilter extends CrudFilter {
field: string;
}

const [filterState, setFilterState] = useState<string | undefined>("");

useEffect(() => {
setFilters((prevFilters: CustomFilter[]) => {
if (filterState === "pending") {
console.log("Previous Filters:", prevFilters);
return [
...prevFilters,
{
field: "status",
operator: "eq",
value: filterState,
},
];
} else {
return prevFilters.filter(filter => filter.field !== "status");
}
});
}, [filterState]);
import { CrudFilter } from 'path-to-crudfilter-definition'; // Adjust the import path as necessary

interface CustomFilter extends CrudFilter {
field: string;
}

const [filterState, setFilterState] = useState<string | undefined>("");

useEffect(() => {
setFilters((prevFilters: CustomFilter[]) => {
if (filterState === "pending") {
console.log("Previous Filters:", prevFilters);
return [
...prevFilters,
{
field: "status",
operator: "eq",
value: filterState,
},
];
} else {
return prevFilters.filter(filter => filter.field !== "status");
}
});
}, [filterState]);
In this code: - We define a CustomFilter interface that extends CrudFilter and includes the field property. - We use this CustomFilter type in the useEffect hook to ensure TypeScript recognizes the field property. This should resolve the TypeScript error and allow you to continue using the field property in your filter objects. For more details, you can refer to the CrudFilter documentation (https://refine.dev/docs/core/interface-references/#crudfilter). If you need further clarification on CrudFilter, you might need to consult additional refine documentation or resources. ---------------------- Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon: ----------------------
kapa.ai
kapa.ai7mo ago
<@1257731147509661728> kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let us know how it did by reacting below
fair-rose
fair-roseOP7mo ago
@kapa.ai An interface can only extend an object type or intersection of object types with statically known members.ts(2312)
kapa.ai
kapa.ai7mo ago
Let me check the knowledge base for you. One moment! :books: ---------------------- The error "An interface can only extend an object type or intersection of object types with statically known members" occurs because TypeScript interfaces can only extend other interfaces or object types with known properties. Given that CrudFilter is a union type (LogicalFilter | ConditionalFilter), it cannot be directly extended by an interface. Instead, you can create a new type that includes the properties you need. Here’s how you can define a new type that includes the field property and update your code accordingly:
type CustomFilter = {
field: string;
operator: string;
value: any;
};

const [filterState, setFilterState] = useState<string | undefined>("");

useEffect(() => {
setFilters((prevFilters: CustomFilter[]) => {
if (filterState === "pending") {
console.log("Previous Filters:", prevFilters);
return [
...prevFilters,
{
field: "status",
operator: "eq",
value: filterState,
},
];
} else {
return prevFilters.filter(filter => filter.field !== "status");
}
});
}, [filterState]);
type CustomFilter = {
field: string;
operator: string;
value: any;
};

const [filterState, setFilterState] = useState<string | undefined>("");

useEffect(() => {
setFilters((prevFilters: CustomFilter[]) => {
if (filterState === "pending") {
console.log("Previous Filters:", prevFilters);
return [
...prevFilters,
{
field: "status",
operator: "eq",
value: filterState,
},
];
} else {
return prevFilters.filter(filter => filter.field !== "status");
}
});
}, [filterState]);
In this code: - We define a CustomFilter type that includes the field, operator, and value properties. - We use this CustomFilter type in the useEffect hook to ensure TypeScript recognizes the field property. This approach avoids the issue of trying to extend a union type and ensures that your filter objects have the correct structure. For more details, you can refer to the CrudFilter documentation (https://refine.dev/docs/core/interface-references/#crudfilter). If you need further clarification on CrudFilter, you might need to consult additional refine documentation or resources. ---------------------- Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon: ----------------------
kapa.ai
kapa.ai7mo ago
<@1257731147509661728> kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let us know how it did by reacting below
fair-rose
fair-roseOP7mo ago
@kapa.ai No overload matches this call. Overload 1 of 2, '(filters: CrudFilter[], behavior?: SetFilterBehavior | undefined): void', gave the following error. Argument of type '(prevFilters: CustomFilter[]) => CustomFilter[]' is not assignable to parameter of type 'CrudFilter[]'. Overload 2 of 2, '(setter: (prevFilters: CrudFilter[]) => CrudFilter[]): void', gave the following error. Argument of type '(prevFilters: CustomFilter[]) => CustomFilter[]' is not assignable to parameter of type '(prevFilters: CrudFilter[]) => CrudFilter[]'. Types of parameters 'prevFilters' and 'prevFilters' are incompatible. Type 'CrudFilter[]' is not assignable to type 'CustomFilter[]'. Type 'CrudFilter' is not assignable to type 'CustomFilter'. Property 'field' is missing in type 'ConditionalFilter' but required in type 'CustomFilter'.ts(2769) filter.ts(2, 5): 'field' is declared here.
kapa.ai
kapa.ai7mo ago
Let me check the knowledge base for you. One moment! :books: ---------------------- The error you're encountering is due to the type mismatch between CrudFilter and your custom CustomFilter. Since CrudFilter can be either a LogicalFilter or a ConditionalFilter, and ConditionalFilter does not have a field property, you need to ensure that your filter logic correctly handles these types. To resolve this, you can use type guards to differentiate between LogicalFilter and ConditionalFilter within your useEffect hook. Here’s how you can update your code:
import { CrudFilter, LogicalFilter, ConditionalFilter } from 'path-to-crudfilter-definition'; // Adjust the import path as necessary

const [filterState, setFilterState] = useState<string | undefined>("");

useEffect(() => {
setFilters((prevFilters: CrudFilter[]) => {
if (filterState === "pending") {
console.log("Previous Filters:", prevFilters);
return [
...prevFilters,
{
field: "status",
operator: "eq",
value: filterState,
} as LogicalFilter, // Ensure the new filter is treated as a LogicalFilter
];
} else {
return prevFilters.filter((filter): filter is LogicalFilter => {
return 'field' in filter && filter.field !== "status";
});
}
});
}, [filterState]);
import { CrudFilter, LogicalFilter, ConditionalFilter } from 'path-to-crudfilter-definition'; // Adjust the import path as necessary

const [filterState, setFilterState] = useState<string | undefined>("");

useEffect(() => {
setFilters((prevFilters: CrudFilter[]) => {
if (filterState === "pending") {
console.log("Previous Filters:", prevFilters);
return [
...prevFilters,
{
field: "status",
operator: "eq",
value: filterState,
} as LogicalFilter, // Ensure the new filter is treated as a LogicalFilter
];
} else {
return prevFilters.filter((filter): filter is LogicalFilter => {
return 'field' in filter && filter.field !== "status";
});
}
});
}, [filterState]);
In this code: - We import the CrudFilter, LogicalFilter, and ConditionalFilter types. - We use a type guard to ensure that the new filter is treated as a LogicalFilter. - We filter out the status field only if the filter is a LogicalFilter. This approach ensures that TypeScript correctly understands the types being used and avoids the type mismatch error. For more details, you can refer to the CrudFilter documentation (https://refine.dev/docs/core/interface-references/#crudfilter). If you need further clarification on CrudFilter, you might need to consult additional refine documentation or resources. ---------------------- Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon: ----------------------
kapa.ai
kapa.ai7mo ago
<@1257731147509661728> kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let us know how it did by reacting below
flat-fuchsia
flat-fuchsia7mo ago
Hello @obelisk291 kapa.ai is now available for free at https://refine.dev/docs! To improve our community interaction on the Refine Discord server and keep our focus on Q&A sharing, we invite you to our website to use kapa.ai.

Did you find this page helpful?