i18n provider doesn't match the types from i18next
The type that refine expects in the I18nProvider, the translate key doesn't match the type of the 18next t function.
Getting the following error:
In this code taken directly from the documentation page:
5 Replies
Hi @JuicyBenjamin. I'm kapa.ai, your friendly support bot. I will try to answer your question by searching through the knowledge base. :wave:
----------------------
You're right, there seems to be a mismatch between the types expected by refine's
I18nProvider
and the types returned by i18next's t
function. This is a known issue that has been reported in the refine GitHub repository. Let me explain the problem and provide a workaround.
The issue arises because refine's I18nProvider
expects the translate
function to always return a string, while i18next's t
function can return different types depending on the configuration and usage.
There are a couple of ways to address this:
1. Type assertion (quick workaround):
You can use a type assertion to tell TypeScript that the result of the t
function will be a string. Here's how you can modify the code:
2. Use the second argument for options:
According to the refine documentation on i18n Provider (https://refine.dev/docs/i18n/i18n-provider/#methods), you can pass the options as the second argument. This approach might resolve the type mismatch:
It's worth noting that this issue has been discussed in the refine GitHub repository. In issue #6313 (https://github.com/refinedev/refine/issues/6313), a user reported a similar problem with the typing for i18next being too rigid. The refine team acknowledged this and mentioned that they were planning to work on allowing customization of the translation key type with module augmentation.
As a temporary solution, they suggested passing the array key in an object using the second argument, which aligns with the second approach I mentioned above.
If these workarounds don't solve your problem or if you need a more robust solution, you might want to consider creating a custom wrapper for the t
function that ensures it always returns a string, or wait for the refine team to implement a more flexible typing system for the i18n provider.
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------<@167296048367140864> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
wise-whiteOP•2mo ago
@kapa.ai while the type assertion will help the translate key error, I'm stuck with the t type error:
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books:
----------------------
The error you're encountering is due to a mismatch in the function signature of the
t
function from i18next and how it's being called in the translate
method of the i18nProvider
. Let's address this issue based on the information from the refine documentation.
According to the refine documentation on i18n Provider methods (https://refine.dev/docs/i18n/i18n-provider/#methods), the translate
function in the i18nProvider
should have two function signatures:
To align with these signatures and resolve the type error, you should modify your i18nProvider
implementation as follows:
This implementation handles both function signatures and correctly passes the parameters to the i18next t
function. Here's what it does:
1. If options
is a string, it treats it as the defaultMessage
and passes it as the defaultValue
option to the t
function.
2. Otherwise, it spreads the options
object (if provided) and adds the defaultMessage
as the defaultValue
option.
This approach should resolve the type error you're encountering while maintaining compatibility with both refine's I18nProvider
interface and i18next's t
function.
Remember to add a type assertion to string if the TypeScript compiler still complains about the return type:
This solution is based on the information provided in the refine i18n Provider documentation (https://refine.dev/docs/i18n/i18n-provider/#methods) and should address the type mismatch issues you're experiencing.
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------<@167296048367140864> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.