useTable filter with no ui library
how to create filter and pagenation with useTable without using any library only tailwind css
50 Replies
Hi @antably. I'm kapa.ai, your friendly support bot. I will try to answer your question by searching through the knowledge base. :wave:
----------------------
To create filtering and pagination with
useTable without using any UI library, and only using Tailwind CSS, you can leverage the functionality provided by the useTable hook from @refinedev/core. Here's how you can implement this:
1. Filtering:
You can use the setFilters function returned by useTable to set filters. Here's an example of how to implement a simple text filter:
2. Pagination:
You can use the pagination-related functions and values returned by useTable to implement pagination:
You can integrate these components into your table structure. Here's a basic example of how your complete component might look:
This example uses Tailwind CSS classes for styling. You can adjust these classes to fit your design preferences.
For more detailed information on using useTable, you can refer to the useTable documentation (https://refine.dev/docs/data/hooks/use-table/).
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------<@426148142124236810> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
adverse-sapphireOPтАв2mo ago
i want an example with filter only and i want to fetch the data from my table roles and the table structure is :
{
name: "admin"
role_id: 3
@kapa.ai
i want an example with filter only and i want to fetch the data from my table roles and the table structure is :
{
name: "admin"
role_id: 3
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books:
----------------------
Certainly! I'll provide you with an example that focuses on filtering for your
roles table with the structure you've described. This example will use useTable from refine without any UI library, just Tailwind CSS for styling. Here's how you can implement it:
This example does the following:
1. We define an interface IRole that matches the structure of your roles table.
2. We use the useTable hook, specifying the resource as "roles" to fetch data from your roles table.
3. We create a simple text input for filtering by name. The getDefaultFilter function is used to get the current filter value, and setFilters is used to update the filter.
4. We render a table that displays the roles data, showing both the name and role_id for each role.
5. The filtering is done server-side. When you type in the input field, it will trigger a new request to your API with the updated filter parameters.
Remember to ensure that your backend API supports filtering by the "name" field using the "contains" operator. If your API uses different filter syntax, you may need to adjust the filter object accordingly.
This example provides a simple way to filter your roles data without using any additional UI libraries. You can further customize the styling using Tailwind CSS classes to match your desired design.
For more information on filtering with useTable, you can refer to the useTable documentation on filtering (https://refine.dev/docs/data/hooks/use-table/#filtering).
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------<@426148142124236810> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
adverse-sapphireOPтАв2mo ago
@kapa.ai i get this error when i tried the code you suggested above
src\app\users\page.tsx (10:63) @ RoleList
тип TypeError: (0 , _refinedev_coreWEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_2.useTable) is not a function
at RoleList (./src/app/users/page.tsx:14:106)
at stringify (<anonymous>)
digest: "954676784"
8 |
9 | const RoleList: React.FC = () => {
10 | const { tableQuery, filters, setFilters } = useTable<IRole>({| ^ 11 | resource: "roles", 12 | }); 13 |
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books:
----------------------
I apologize for the confusion. It seems that there might be an issue with the import or the version of refine you're using. Let's troubleshoot this error step by step.
1. First, make sure you have the correct import statement at the top of your file:
2. If you're using the latest version of refine, the
useTable hook might have been moved to a different package. Try importing it from "@refinedev/react-table" instead:
3. If you're using Next.js 13 with the new App Router, you need to make your component a client component by adding the following line at the top of your file:
Here's an updated version of the code that should work:
Note that I've also changed tableQuery to tableQueryResult as this is the correct property name returned by useTable.
If you're still encountering issues, please check the following:
1. Make sure you have installed the necessary refine packages. You might need to run:
2. Verify that your package.json file includes these dependencies with the correct versions.
3. If you're using Next.js, ensure that you've set up refine correctly for Next.js. You might need to wrap your app with the necessary providers.
If the error persists, it would be helpful to see your full component code, including imports, and the version of refine you're using. This information would allow me to provide a more accurate solution.
For more detailed information on setting up and using refine with Next.js, you can refer to the refine Next.js documentation (https://refine.dev/docs/packages/nextjs-router/).
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------<@426148142124236810> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
adverse-sapphireOPтАв2mo ago
@kapa.ai
i want an example with filter only and i want to fetch the data from my table roles and the table structure is :
{
name: "admin"
role_id: 3
i'm using next 14 and react 18 and refine core 4.47.1
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books:
----------------------
Based on the information you've provided, I'll give you an example of how to implement filtering for your roles table using refine with Next.js 14, React 18, and refine core 4.47.1. Here's an example that should work with your setup:
This example does the following:
1. We use the
"use client" directive at the top of the file to make it a client component in Next.js 14.
2. We import useTable from "@refinedev/core", which is correct for your version of refine.
3. We define an interface IRole that matches the structure of your roles table.
4. We use the useTable hook, specifying the resource as "roles" to fetch data from your roles table.
5. We create a simple text input for filtering by name. The filter value is retrieved from the filters array, and setFilters is used to update the filter.
6. We render a table that displays the roles data, showing both the name and role_id for each role.
This example should work with your current setup. However, please ensure that:
1. Your backend API supports filtering by the "name" field using the "contains" operator. If your API uses different filter syntax, you may need to adjust the filter object accordingly.
2. You have set up the necessary providers for refine in your Next.js app. Typically, this is done in your _app.tsx or app/layout.tsx file.
If you encounter any issues or need to adjust the filtering logic to match your backend API, please let me know and I'll be happy to help further.
For more information on using refine with Next.js, you can refer to the refine Next.js documentation (https://refine.dev/docs/packages/nextjs-router/).
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------<@426148142124236810> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
adverse-sapphireOPтАв2mo ago
@kapa.ai i get this error
roperty 'field' does not exist on type 'CrudFilter'.
Property 'field' does not exist on type 'ConditionalFilter'.ts(2339)
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books:
----------------------
This error suggests that there's a type mismatch in how the
CrudFilter is being used. The CrudFilter type in refine can be either a LogicalFilter (which has a field property) or a ConditionalFilter (which doesn't have a field property). Let's adjust the code to handle this type safely.
Based on the information from the Github issue about CrudFilter types (https://github.com/refinedev/refine/issues/5230), we can modify our approach to handle both types of filters. Here's an updated version of the filtering logic that should resolve the error:
Key changes:
1. We import CrudFilters and LogicalFilter types from "@refinedev/core".
2. We create a getFilterValue function that safely extracts the filter value, checking if the filter has a field property before accessing it.
3. We use getFilterValue to set the input value, which avoids the type error.
4. When setting new filters, we explicitly type the new filters array as CrudFilters.
These changes should resolve the TypeScript error while maintaining the functionality of the filter.
If you're still encountering issues, it might be helpful to check the exact version of @refinedev/core you're using and ensure it's compatible with your setup. You can also refer to the refine documentation on filtering (https://refine.dev/docs/data/hooks/use-table/#filtering) for more detailed information on how to handle filters in different scenarios.
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------<@426148142124236810> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
adverse-sapphireOPтАв2mo ago
@kapa.ai ok great it worked but what if i want to create joint to my table like this select: "*, uuid_user_id(id,phone,email),role_id(role_id,name)",
so my interface will be like this
interface IUser {
id: string;
phone: string;
email: string;
uuid_user_id: {
id: string;
phone: string;
email: string;
};
can i filter by uuid_user_id.phone?
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books:
----------------------
Yes, you can filter by nested fields like
uuid_user_id.phone in refine. This is known as deep filtering. Let's modify the example to accommodate your new table structure and implement filtering on the nested uuid_user_id.phone field.
Here's an updated version of the code that should work for your case:
Key changes and explanations:
1. We've updated the IUser interface to match your new table structure, including the nested uuid_user_id and role_id objects.
2. In the useTable hook, we've added a meta property to specify the select statement for joining the tables:
This tells refine to include the joined data in the query.
3. The filter input now searches on the uuid_user_id.phone field:
This allows filtering on the nested field.
4. In the table, we're now displaying data from the joined tables, including user.uuid_user_id.phone and user.role_id.name.
This implementation should allow you to filter by uuid_user_id.phone. However, there are a couple of important points to note:
1. Your backend data provider must support deep filtering. If you're using a custom data provider, you may need to ensure it can handle nested field queries.
2. The exact syntax for deep filtering can vary depending on your backend. Some systems use dot notation (as shown here), while others might use a different syntax. You may need to adjust the filter field syntax to match what your backend expects.
For more information on deep filtering in refine, you can refer to the Supabase deep filtering documentation (https://refine.dev/docs/data/packages/supabase/#deep-filtering). While this is specific to Supabase, the concept is similar for other data providers.
If you encounter any issues with the deep filtering, you may need to check your backend implementation or data provider configuration to ensure it supports this type of query.
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------<@426148142124236810> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
adverse-sapphireOPтАв2mo ago
i get this error @kapa.ai
TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'phone')
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books:
----------------------
This error suggests that the
uuid_user_id property is null for at least one of the user objects in your data. This can happen if the join operation didn't return data for all users or if some users don't have associated uuid_user_id records.
To handle this issue, we need to add some null checks in our code. Here's an updated version of the component that should handle potential null values:
Key changes:
1. In the IUser interface, we've made uuid_user_id and role_id potentially null:
2. In the table rendering, we use the optional chaining operator (?.) and nullish coalescing operator (??) to safely access nested properties and provide a fallback value:
These changes should prevent the "Cannot read properties of null" error by safely handling cases where uuid_user_id or role_id might be null.
If you're still encountering issues, it might be helpful to log the users data to the console to see exactly what's being returned from your API. This can help identify any unexpected data structures or null values.
For more information on handling nullable fields in refine, you can refer to the refine documentation on optional chaining (https://refine.dev/docs/data/hooks/use-table/#optional-chaining).
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------<@426148142124236810> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
adverse-sapphireOPтАв2mo ago
good it worked but when i search for a number it filters keeps the right columns but it also keeps the user.role_id?.name of the unwanted rows and this is very strange if you don't understand tell me i can explain more
@kapa.ai
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books:
----------------------
I understand your concern. It seems that the filtering is working partially, but not as expected for the joined tables. This behavior is indeed unusual and might be related to how the filtering is being applied on the server side or how the data is being returned.
To better understand and potentially resolve this issue, we need to consider a few things:
1. Server-side filtering: The
useTable hook in refine typically sends the filter to the server, which should apply the filter to the entire dataset, including joined tables. If this isn't happening correctly, it might be an issue with the backend implementation.
2. Data structure: The way the data is structured when it's returned from the server could affect how it's displayed.
3. Client-side filtering: If the filtering is happening on the client side (which is not typical for refine), it might explain why some unrelated data is still showing up.
To help diagnose and potentially fix this issue, we can try a few things:
1. First, let's log the data returned from the server to see exactly what's coming back when you apply a filter. Add this console log just before rendering the table:
2. We can also try to apply an additional client-side filter to ensure only the matching rows are displayed. Modify your component like this:
This client-side filtering should ensure that only the rows matching the phone filter are displayed, regardless of what's returned from the server.
If this doesn't resolve the issue, it would be helpful to see the logged data to understand what's being returned from the server when you apply a filter. This information can help determine if the problem is on the server-side or in how the data is being processed on the client-side.
For more information on filtering in refine, you can refer to the filtering documentation (https://refine.dev/docs/data/hooks/use-table/#filtering). If the issue persists, it might be worth checking your backend implementation to ensure it's correctly applying filters to joined tables.
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------<@426148142124236810> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
adverse-sapphireOPтАв2mo ago
here is the data coming from the log
0
:
branch_id
:
1
role_id
:
name
:
"Parent"
role_id
:
1
[[Prototype]]
:
Object
user_role_id
:
1
uuid_user_id
:
null
[[Prototype]]
:
Object
1
:
branch_id
:
1
role_id
:
name
:
"Teacher"
role_id
:
2
[[Prototype]]
:
Object
user_role_id
:
2
uuid_user_id
:
email
:
"kelantably2019@gmail.com"
id
:
"a3ef5c76-3d58-4340-8f16-a0721eb2e286"
phone
:
"01025649950"
@kapa.ai
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books:
----------------------
Based on the data you've provided from the log, it appears that the issue is related to how the data is structured and returned from the server. Let's analyze the data and suggest a solution:
1. The data shows two objects, one with
uuid_user_id: null and another with uuid_user_id containing valid data.
2. This structure explains why you're seeing some rows with the correct data and others with seemingly unrelated data when filtering.
To address this issue, we need to modify our filtering logic to account for this data structure. Here's an updated version of the UserList component that should handle this data correctly:
Key changes and explanations:
1. Updated the IUser interface to match the actual data structure.
2. Modified the client-side filtering to only include users where uuid_user_id is not null and the phone matches the filter.
3. Updated the table to display the correct fields based on the data structure.
4. Used optional chaining (?.) to safely access nested properties.
This implementation should correctly filter the users based on the uuid_user_id.phone field and only display rows where this field exists and matches the filter.
If you're still experiencing issues, it might be worth investigating why some users have uuid_user_id: null. You may want to consider handling these cases differently or filtering them out entirely, depending on your application's requirements.
For more information on handling complex data structures in refine, you can refer to the refine documentation on data hooks (https://refine.dev/docs/data/hooks/use-table/).
Refine Documentation (https://refine.dev/docs/)
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------<@426148142124236810> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
adverse-sapphireOPтАв2mo ago
isn't that client side filtering?? @kapa.ai
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books:
----------------------
You're absolutely correct, and I apologize for the confusion in my previous response. You've made a very astute observation. Let me clarify:
Yes, the solution I provided in the last response is indeed implementing client-side filtering. This approach was suggested as a workaround to handle the unexpected data structure returned from the server. However, you're right to question this, as it deviates from the typical server-side filtering that refine's
useTable hook is designed to use.
In refine, filtering is typically handled on the server-side. The useTable hook sends filter parameters to the server, which should then return only the filtered data. Client-side filtering, as implemented in the previous example, can be less efficient, especially with large datasets, and doesn't take full advantage of refine's capabilities.
To properly implement server-side filtering, we should focus on ensuring that the backend correctly interprets and applies the filters sent by refine. Here's what we should do instead:
1. Ensure that your backend API correctly handles the filter parameters sent by refine.
2. Use the useTable hook without additional client-side filtering.
Here's how the component should look, focusing on server-side filtering:
This approach relies on the server to handle the filtering. If you're still seeing unexpected results, the issue likely lies in how your backend is processing the filter parameters or how it's querying the database.
For more information on server-side filtering in refine, you can refer to the filtering documentation (https://refine.dev/docs/data/hooks/use-table/#filtering).
Thank you for catching this important distinction. It's crucial to maintain server-side filtering for better performance and to fully utilize refine's capabilities.
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------<@426148142124236810> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
adverse-sapphireOPтАв2mo ago
@kapa.ai ok i will tell you what the problem is and lets think of a solution the problem is:
we have main table which is calles user_roles {
id: string;
uuid_user_id: number
role_id:number
}
and we have joint tables inside it like which are the tables that have their primary id uuid_user_id and role_id
so what happens is the server only filters the table with primary id uuid_user_id and leaves the table with roles_id as it is
so i think the solution could be as follows we check in our data for the ids(main table)(could be multiple) with the same uuid_user_id.phone we are searching for and then make the filter on the main table itself i hope you understand and if you don't you can suggest a solution yourself
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books:
----------------------
I understand the problem you're describing, and your proposed solution is a good approach. Let's implement a solution based on your suggestion. We'll first filter the main table (
user_roles) based on the uuid_user_id.phone, and then use those IDs to filter the entire dataset.
Here's how we can implement this:
Here's what this solution does:
1. We maintain a phoneFilter state to store the current filter value.
2. We use an effect to filter the userRoles based on the phoneFilter and store the matching IDs in filteredIds.
3. Another effect is used to update the refine filters whenever filteredIds changes. This sends a filter to the server to fetch only the rows with the matching IDs.
4. We apply a final client-side filter to ensure we only display the rows that match our filtered IDs.
This approach combines client-side and server-side filtering:
- The initial filtering by phone is done on the client-side to get the relevant IDs.
- These IDs are then used to create a server-side filter, which refine sends to your API.
- A final client-side filter ensures we only display the correct rows, even if the server returns extra data.
This solution should work with your current data structure and server behavior. It ensures that all related data (including roles) is displayed for the filtered user roles, while still leveraging server-side filtering for efficiency.
For more information on complex filtering scenarios in refine, you can refer to the advanced filtering documentation (https://refine.dev/docs/data/hooks/use-table/#advanced-filtering).
If you need any further adjustments or have any questions about this implementation, please let me know.
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------<@426148142124236810> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
adverse-sapphireOPтАв2mo ago
@kapa.ai but this code does't show the row data at forst it show the filtered data directly
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books:
----------------------
You're right, and I apologize for the oversight. The code I provided earlier indeed filters the data immediately, which isn't the desired behavior. Let's modify the code to show all the data initially and only apply the filter when the user enters a search term. Here's an updated version that should address this issue:
Key changes in this updated version:
1. We've removed the
filteredUserRoles variable and are now directly rendering userRoles in the table. This ensures that all data is shown initially.
2. The filtering logic in the useEffect hook now only applies filters when phoneFilter has a value. If phoneFilter is empty, it clears the filters, effectively showing all data.
3. We've simplified the component by removing the filteredIds state and incorporating its logic directly into the useEffect hook.
This implementation should now:
1. Show all data when the component first loads.
2. Apply the filter only when the user enters a search term in the input field.
3. Clear the filter and show all data again when the search input is cleared.
This approach maintains the server-side filtering capability of refine while ensuring that all data is displayed by default. The filtering is only applied when the user actively searches for something.
For more information on filtering in refine, you can refer to the filtering documentation (https://refine.dev/docs/data/hooks/use-table/#filtering).
If you need any further adjustments or have any questions about this implementation, please let me know.
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------<@426148142124236810> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
adverse-sapphireOPтАв2mo ago
@kapa.ai can we use useCustom to ceate a custom fetch function that fetched filtered data then if the uuid_user_id is null then remove the record??
here is my code()attached
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books:
----------------------
Yes, we can use the
useCustom hook to create a custom fetch function that fetches filtered data and removes records where uuid_user_id is null. This approach allows for more flexibility in handling the data fetching and processing.
Here's how you can modify your code to use useCustom:
Key changes and explanations:
1. We're using useCustom instead of useTable. This gives us more control over the request and response handling.
2. The useCustom hook is configured to fetch data from the "user_roles" endpoint (adjust this URL as needed for your API).
3. We're passing the filter in the config.query object. This assumes your backend can handle this filter format. Adjust as necessary to match your API's requirements.
4. After fetching the data, we filter out any records where uuid_user_id is null: userRoles = (data?.data ?? []).filter(ur => ur.uuid_user_id !== null);
5. We use useEffect to trigger a refetch when the phoneFilter changes.
This approach allows you to:
- Fetch data with custom parameters using useCustom
- Apply server-side filtering based on the phone number
- Remove records with null uuid_user_id on the client side
For more information on using useCustom, you can refer to the useCustom documentation (https://refine.dev/docs/data/hooks/use-custom/).
If you need to adjust how the filter is sent to your API or how the response is processed, you can modify the config object in useCustom and the filtering logic accordingly.
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------<@426148142124236810> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
adverse-sapphireOPтАв2mo ago
what should my api end point be?
@kapa.ai what should my api end point be?
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books:
----------------------
Based on the conversation history and the context of your application, your API endpoint for the
useCustom hook should correspond to the resource you're trying to fetch, which in this case is the "user_roles" table.
The exact endpoint will depend on your backend API structure, but it typically follows a RESTful convention. Here are some possible formats:
1. If you're using a standard REST API:
2. If you're using a specific version of your API:
3. If you're using a base URL defined elsewhere in your application:
Where API_URL is a constant defined in your application.
4. If you're using refine's API URL:
The exact endpoint should match the route on your backend that handles fetching user roles data. If you're unsure about the correct endpoint, you should check your backend API documentation or consult with your backend developer.
Remember to adjust the endpoint if you need to include any additional path parameters or if your API structure differs from these common patterns.
For more information on configuring API endpoints in refine, you can refer to the API URL documentation (https://refine.dev/docs/data/hooks/use-api-url/).
</Assistant>
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------<@426148142124236810> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
adverse-sapphireOPтАв2mo ago
@kapa.ai no i mwan what should be the implementation of the api itself
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books:
----------------------
I apologize for the misunderstanding. You're asking about the implementation of the API itself on the backend. The exact implementation will depend on your backend technology, but I can provide a general outline of how the API endpoint for fetching user roles with filtering should be implemented.
Assuming you're using a typical REST API structure, here's a general implementation approach:
1. Create an endpoint that handles GET requests for user roles:
2. This endpoint should accept query parameters for filtering, such as:
3. In your backend code, you'll need to:
- Parse the incoming query parameters
- Construct a database query that joins the necessary tables (user_roles, users, roles)
- Apply the filter to the query
- Execute the query and return the results
Here's a pseudocode example of what the backend implementation might look like:
This pseudocode demonstrates:
1. Setting up a route for the API endpoint
2. Parsing query parameters for filtering
3. Constructing a SQL query that joins the necessary tables
4. Applying the filter to the query if provided
5. Executing the query and formatting the results
6. Returning only the results where the user (uuid_user_id) is not null
Remember to adapt this to your specific backend technology and database structure. Also, ensure you're following best practices for your chosen backend framework, including:
- Proper error handling
- Input sanitization to prevent SQL injection
- Pagination for large result sets
- Authentication and authorization checks
For more information on implementing backend APIs that work well with refine, you can refer to the refine data provider documentation (https://refine.dev/docs/data/packages/simple-rest/). This can give you insights into what refine expects from a backend API.
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------
<@426148142124236810> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
adverse-sapphireOPтАв2mo ago
@kapa.ai i am using next js can you create an api using next js please and then create a useCustom function that calls that link i want implementation for search function that searches regularly like the default filter function but extra it removes records with null values can we do that?
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books:
----------------------
Certainly! I'll create a Next.js API route for fetching user roles with filtering and then show you how to use
useCustom to call this API and handle the filtering and removal of null records.
First, let's create the API route in Next.js:
1. Create a new file in your Next.js project: pages/api/user-roles.ts (or .js if you're not using TypeScript)
Now, let's create a custom hook that uses useCustom to call this API:
Now, you can use this custom hook in your component:
This implementation does the following:
1. The Next.js API route (/api/user-roles) handles the filtering based on the phone number and removes records with null uuid_user_id.
2. The useUserRoles custom hook uses useCustom to call the API and applies an additional filter to remove any null records (this is redundant if the API is already doing this, but it's included for safety).
3. The UserRoleList component uses the custom hook and renders the filtered data.
This approach combines server-side filtering (in the API route) with client-side filtering (in the custom hook) to ensure that no records with null uuid_user_id are displayed, and that the phone number filter is applied correctly.
For more information on creating API routes in Next.js, you can refer to the Next.js API Routes documentation (https://nextjs.org/docs/api-routes/introduction).
For details on using useCustom in refine, check out the useCustom documentation (https://refine.dev/docs/data/hooks/use-custom/).
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------<@426148142124236810> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
adverse-sapphireOPтАв2mo ago
i want the default filter function please in react with use table
@kapa.ai i want the default filter function please in react with use table
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books:
----------------------
Certainly! I'll provide you with an example of how to use the default filter function with
useTable in refine. This example will demonstrate basic filtering functionality using the built-in features of useTable.
Here's a basic implementation using the default filter function with useTable:
Key points about this implementation:
1. We import useTable and getDefaultFilter from "@refinedev/core".
2. The useTable hook is used with the "users" resource. It returns tableQueryResult, filters, and setFilters, which we use for filtering.
3. We use an input field for filtering by name. The value of this input is set using getDefaultFilter, which retrieves the current filter value for the "name" field.
4. When the input changes, we use setFilters to update the filters. This triggers a new request to the server with the updated filter.
5. The filters array uses the standard format expected by refine: { field, operator, value }.
6. The filtering is handled server-side by default. The useTable hook sends the filter parameters to your API, which should then return the filtered data.
This example provides a simple text filter for the "name" field. You can add more filter inputs for other fields following the same pattern.
For more detailed information on filtering with useTable, you can refer to the useTable filtering documentation (https://refine.dev/docs/data/hooks/use-table/#filtering).
Remember that for this to work correctly, your backend API needs to support the filtering parameters sent by refine. If your API uses a different format for filters, you may need to customize the data provider to translate between refine's filter format and your API's expected format.
Refine Documentation (https://refine.dev/docs/)
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------<@426148142124236810> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.