kapa.ai
kapa.ai
RRefine
Created by xenial-black on 2/22/2025 in #ask-any-question
remove breadcrumb back button
4 replies
RRefine
Created by quickest-silver on 2/22/2025 in #ask-any-question
remove breadcrumb back button
---------------------- To remove the breadcrumb back button in refine, you have a couple of options: 1. Set the breadcrumb prop to false on the specific component: You can disable the breadcrumb (which includes the back button) for individual components like Create, Edit, or Show by setting the breadcrumb prop to false. For example:
<Create breadcrumb={false}>
{/* ... */}
</Create>
<Create breadcrumb={false}>
{/* ... */}
</Create>
This approach is mentioned in the Create component documentation. 2. Use the goBack prop: For more fine-grained control, you can use the goBack prop to specifically remove the back button while keeping the rest of the breadcrumb. Set goBack to false or null:
<Create goBack={false}>
{/* ... */}
</Create>
<Create goBack={false}>
{/* ... */}
</Create>
This is documented in the Mantine UI Create component documentation. These methods should work for various UI integrations in refine, including Material UI, Mantine, and others. Choose the approach that best fits your needs - either removing the entire breadcrumb or just the back button. ---------------------- Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon: ----------------------
4 replies
RRefine
Created by genetic-orange on 2/22/2025 in #ask-any-question
remove breadcrumb back button
Hi @koop_g. I'm kapa.ai, your friendly support bot. I will try to answer your question by searching through the knowledge base. :wave:
4 replies
RRefine
Created by conscious-sapphire on 2/22/2025 in #ask-any-question
is refine no code/low code?
5 replies
RRefine
Created by subsequent-cyan on 2/22/2025 in #ask-any-question
is refine no code/low code?
So, with Refine, you can start with a base CRM structure and have full access to modify and extend the code as needed for your specific requirements. This approach allows you to benefit from pre-built functionality while maintaining the flexibility to customize every aspect of your application. ---------------------- Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon: ----------------------
5 replies
RRefine
Created by sensitive-blue on 2/22/2025 in #ask-any-question
is refine no code/low code?
---------------------- Refine is not a no-code/low-code platform in the traditional sense. It's actually a React-based framework that provides a sweet spot between traditional development and low-code solutions. Refine is designed for developers who want to build data-intensive applications quickly without sacrificing flexibility or control over the code. It offers a set of hooks and components that streamline the development process, but you still have full access to the source code and can customize it as needed. Regarding your need for a base CRM structure with full control over the code, Refine can indeed provide this. Here are a couple of relevant points: 1. Refine offers a complete CRM example project that you can use as a starting point. This project includes features like dashboard analytics, calendar, scrumboard, and CRUD operations for managing companies, contacts, and quotes. 2. You can access the full source code of this CRM example. As mentioned in the README: "This is a complete CRM (Customer Relationship Management) example project built using refine and Ant Design. It provides a set of tools and features to manage customer data, track interactions, and streamline business processes." 3. Refine's architecture is designed to give you full control over your application. As stated in the Refine documentation: "Refine's headless architecture enables the building of highly customizable applications by decoupling business logic from UI and routing."
5 replies
RRefine
Created by stuck-chocolate on 2/22/2025 in #ask-any-question
is refine no code/low code?
Hi @pedro-. I'm kapa.ai, your friendly support bot. I will try to answer your question by searching through the knowledge base. :wave:
5 replies
RRefine
Created by extended-salmon on 2/21/2025 in #ask-any-question
handling slug
4 replies
RRefine
Created by conscious-sapphire on 2/21/2025 in #ask-any-question
handling slug
---------------------- To customize useShow to use a slug field instead of an ID to fetch data, you can follow these steps: 1. Pass the resource prop to useShow to specify the resource you're working with. 2. Use the id prop of useShow to pass the slug value instead of an ID. Here's an example of how you can implement this:
import { useShow, useParsed } from "@refinedev/core";

// Assuming you have the slug available from the URL or some other source
const { slug } = useParsed();

const { queryResult } = useShow({
resource: "posts",
id: slug,
});
import { useShow, useParsed } from "@refinedev/core";

// Assuming you have the slug available from the URL or some other source
const { slug } = useParsed();

const { queryResult } = useShow({
resource: "posts",
id: slug,
});
In this example, we're using the useParsed hook to get the slug from the URL, but you can obtain the slug value from wherever it's available in your application. You may also need to adjust your data provider to handle slug-based requests instead of ID-based ones. This would involve customizing the getOne method of your data provider to use the slug for fetching data. It's important to note that the useShow hook doesn't have built-in support for using fields other than id. The customization happens mainly in how you pass the identifier (in this case, the slug) to the hook and how your data provider handles it. For more information on the useShow hook and its properties, you can refer to the useShow documentation. If you need further customization, you might want to consider creating a custom hook that wraps useShow and handles the slug-to-id conversion if necessary. ---------------------- Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon: ----------------------
4 replies
RRefine
Created by sensitive-blue on 2/21/2025 in #ask-any-question
handling slug
Hi @koop_g. I'm kapa.ai, your friendly support bot. I will try to answer your question by searching through the knowledge base. :wave:
4 replies
RRefine
Created by correct-apricot on 2/21/2025 in #ask-any-question
permission
44 replies
RRefine
Created by xenophobic-harlequin on 2/21/2025 in #ask-any-question
permission
This approach ensures that: - Only logged-in users can access the protected routes. - Among logged-in users, only those with the right permissions can access the admin area. This implementation aligns with the guidance provided in the React Router integration documentation and the Authentication documentation. Remember that while these client-side checks improve user experience, it's crucial to also implement server-side authentication and authorization for proper security. ---------------------- Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon: ----------------------
44 replies
RRefine
Created by quickest-silver on 2/21/2025 in #ask-any-question
permission
---------------------- Certainly! Integrating <CanAccess> with <Authenticated> is a great way to ensure that users are both authenticated and authorized to access certain parts of your application. Here's how you can combine these two components:
import { Refine, Authenticated, CanAccess } from "@refinedev/core";
import { BrowserRouter, Routes, Route, Outlet } from "react-router-dom";
import { ThemedLayoutV2 } from "@refinedev/antd";

const App = () => {
return (
<BrowserRouter>
<Refine
// ... other props
>
<Routes>
<Route
element={
<Authenticated fallback={<Navigate to="/login" />}>
<ThemedLayoutV2>
<CanAccess
resource="admin"
action="list"
fallback={<div>You are not authorized to access this area.</div>}
>
<Outlet />
</CanAccess>
</ThemedLayoutV2>
</Authenticated>
}
>
<Route path="/admin/users" element={<UserList />} />
<Route path="/admin/posts" element={<PostList />} />
{/* Other admin routes */}
</Route>
{/* Public routes */}
<Route path="/" element={<HomePage />} />
<Route path="/login" element={<LoginPage />} />
</Routes>
</Refine>
</BrowserRouter>
);
};
import { Refine, Authenticated, CanAccess } from "@refinedev/core";
import { BrowserRouter, Routes, Route, Outlet } from "react-router-dom";
import { ThemedLayoutV2 } from "@refinedev/antd";

const App = () => {
return (
<BrowserRouter>
<Refine
// ... other props
>
<Routes>
<Route
element={
<Authenticated fallback={<Navigate to="/login" />}>
<ThemedLayoutV2>
<CanAccess
resource="admin"
action="list"
fallback={<div>You are not authorized to access this area.</div>}
>
<Outlet />
</CanAccess>
</ThemedLayoutV2>
</Authenticated>
}
>
<Route path="/admin/users" element={<UserList />} />
<Route path="/admin/posts" element={<PostList />} />
{/* Other admin routes */}
</Route>
{/* Public routes */}
<Route path="/" element={<HomePage />} />
<Route path="/login" element={<LoginPage />} />
</Routes>
</Refine>
</BrowserRouter>
);
};
In this setup: 1. The <Authenticated> component checks if the user is logged in. If not, it redirects to the login page. 2. If the user is authenticated, the <CanAccess> component then checks if the user has the necessary permissions to access the admin area. 3. If both checks pass, the child routes (admin pages) are rendered.
44 replies
RRefine
Created by xenogeneic-maroon on 2/21/2025 in #ask-any-question
permission
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books:
44 replies
RRefine
Created by generous-apricot on 2/21/2025 in #ask-any-question
permission
44 replies
RRefine
Created by reduced-jade on 2/21/2025 in #ask-any-question
permission
"If you want to protect your routes with Access Control Provider, all you have to do is to wrap Outlet with CanAccess component. CanAccess component will infer resource name and action based on the current route and handle the access control from your Access Control Provider for you." Remember that while this client-side check improves user experience, you should also implement server-side access control for proper security. If you need more granular control or different access rules for different sections of your app, you can use multiple CanAccess components at various levels of your routing structure. React Router integration documentation ---------------------- Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon: ----------------------
44 replies
RRefine
Created by conscious-sapphire on 2/21/2025 in #ask-any-question
permission
---------------------- Yes, you can use CanAccess at the app level to control access to blocks of paths in refine. This is particularly useful when you want to apply access control to multiple routes or entire sections of your application. Here's how you can implement this using React Router, which is commonly used with refine:
import { Refine, CanAccess } from "@refinedev/core";
import { BrowserRouter, Routes, Route, Outlet } from "react-router-dom";
import { ThemedLayoutV2 } from "@refinedev/antd";

const App = () => {
return (
<BrowserRouter>
<Refine
// ... other props
>
<Routes>
<Route
element={
<ThemedLayoutV2>
<CanAccess
resource="admin"
action="list"
fallback={<div>You are not authorized to access this area.</div>}
>
<Outlet />
</CanAccess>
</ThemedLayoutV2>
}
>
<Route path="/admin/users" element={<UserList />} />
<Route path="/admin/posts" element={<PostList />} />
{/* Other admin routes */}
</Route>
{/* Public routes */}
<Route path="/" element={<HomePage />} />
<Route path="/login" element={<LoginPage />} />
</Routes>
</Refine>
</BrowserRouter>
);
};
import { Refine, CanAccess } from "@refinedev/core";
import { BrowserRouter, Routes, Route, Outlet } from "react-router-dom";
import { ThemedLayoutV2 } from "@refinedev/antd";

const App = () => {
return (
<BrowserRouter>
<Refine
// ... other props
>
<Routes>
<Route
element={
<ThemedLayoutV2>
<CanAccess
resource="admin"
action="list"
fallback={<div>You are not authorized to access this area.</div>}
>
<Outlet />
</CanAccess>
</ThemedLayoutV2>
}
>
<Route path="/admin/users" element={<UserList />} />
<Route path="/admin/posts" element={<PostList />} />
{/* Other admin routes */}
</Route>
{/* Public routes */}
<Route path="/" element={<HomePage />} />
<Route path="/login" element={<LoginPage />} />
</Routes>
</Refine>
</BrowserRouter>
);
};
In this example, we're using CanAccess to protect all routes under the /admin path. The Outlet component is used to render the child routes. This approach is documented in the React Router integration guide, which states:
44 replies
RRefine
Created by mute-gold on 2/21/2025 in #ask-any-question
permission
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books:
44 replies
RRefine
Created by equal-aqua on 2/21/2025 in #ask-any-question
permission
44 replies
RRefine
Created by other-emerald on 2/21/2025 in #ask-any-question
permission
if (!canAccess?.can) { return <div>You are not authorized to edit this profile.</div>; } if (isLoading) { return <div>Loading...</div>; } return <Edit>{/* User profile content */}</Edit>; }; ``` 2. Implement access control in your data provider: You can add an additional layer of access control in your data provider methods. This way, you can prevent unnecessary requests at the data provider level. 3. Use server-side rendering: If you're using Next.js or another server-side rendering solution, you can perform the access check on the server before rendering the page, which would prevent unnecessary client-side requests. Remember, while client-side access control improves user experience, server-side protection (which you mentioned you have implemented) is crucial for security. The 403 responses you're getting are a good indication that your server-side protection is working as expected. For more details on implementing these strategies, you can refer to the Access Control Provider documentation and the Data Provider documentation. ---------------------- Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon: ----------------------
44 replies