kapa.ai
kapa.ai
RRefine
Created by typical-coral on 7/26/2024 in #ask-any-question
CORS
19 replies
RRefine
Created by passive-yellow on 7/26/2024 in #ask-any-question
CORS
---------------------- I apologize, but I don't have specific information about fetching access tokens from Microsoft tenants or bypassing CORS in a local Refine development environment. The knowledge sources provided don't contain relevant information about Microsoft authentication or CORS bypass techniques for Refine. For Refine-specific authentication questions, I'd recommend checking the Refine authentication documentation (https://refine.dev/docs/guides-concepts/authentication/) or asking on the Refine Discord server (https://discord.gg/refine) for community support. If you're looking to implement Microsoft authentication in a Refine app, you may want to explore using an auth provider that supports Microsoft OAuth, but I don't have specific guidance on how to do that within Refine based on the information available to me. For CORS issues in local development, you typically would handle those on the server side rather than bypassing them on the client. However, I don't have Refine-specific information on how to properly configure CORS for local development scenarios. Hmm, I do not have enough information to answer your question about Microsoft tenant authentication or CORS bypassing specifically for Refine. My knowledge is limited to the Refine-specific content provided. ---------------------- Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon: ----------------------
19 replies
RRefine
Created by flat-fuchsia on 7/26/2024 in #ask-any-question
CORS
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books:
19 replies
RRefine
Created by wise-white on 11/18/2024 in #ask-any-question
auth0 error 401 unauthorized from backend
5 replies
RRefine
Created by stormy-gold on 11/18/2024 in #ask-any-question
auth0 error 401 unauthorized from backend
This example is from the Next.js API route security guide (https://refine.dev/blog/next-js-server-actions-and-data-fetching/#bonus-securing-api-routes-in-our-nextjs-app). 3. If the token from the Auth0 API debugger extension works but the one from your application doesn't, it's possible that there's an issue with how the token is being generated or handled in your application. Double-check that you're using the correct Auth0 configuration (domain, client ID, etc.) in your application. 4. Also, ensure that the scopes and permissions associated with the token generated in your application match those of the token from the API debugger. If you've verified all these points and are still encountering issues, you may need to debug further by checking the exact error message from your backend and comparing the tokens (the one from your application vs. the one from the API debugger) to see if there are any differences. Remember, when working with JWT tokens and authentication, it's crucial to handle sensitive information securely. Always use HTTPS in production and never expose your Auth0 secret keys. If you're still unable to resolve the issue, you might want to reach out to the refine community for more specific help, as mentioned in the refine FAQ (https://refine.dev/docs/guides-concepts/faq/#why-are-there-network-errors-showing-in-the-console). ---------------------- Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon: ----------------------
5 replies
RRefine
Created by rare-sapphire on 11/18/2024 in #ask-any-question
auth0 error 401 unauthorized from backend
---------------------- Based on the information provided in the knowledge sources, it seems like you're encountering an issue with JWT token authentication when using Auth0 with refine. Let's address this problem step by step: 1. First, ensure that you're correctly setting the Authorization header with the JWT token for your API requests. In refine, this is typically done in the authProvider. Here's an example of how to set the token in the check method of the authProvider:
check: async () => {
try {
const token = await getIdTokenClaims();
if (token) {
axios.defaults.headers.common = {
Authorization: `Bearer ${token.__raw}`,
};
return {
authenticated: true,
};
} else {
// Handle case when token is not found
}
} catch (error: any) {
// Handle errors
}
},
check: async () => {
try {
const token = await getIdTokenClaims();
if (token) {
axios.defaults.headers.common = {
Authorization: `Bearer ${token.__raw}`,
};
return {
authenticated: true,
};
} else {
// Handle case when token is not found
}
} catch (error: any) {
// Handle errors
}
},
This code snippet is from the Auth0 integration guide for refine (https://refine.dev/docs/advanced-tutorials/auth/auth0/#auth-provider). 2. If you've correctly set the token but still receive a 401 error, it's possible that the token is not being properly verified on the backend. Make sure your backend is correctly configured to verify Auth0 tokens. Here's an example of how you might verify a token on the backend:
import jwt from "jsonwebtoken";

export default function handler(req, res) {
const { authorization } = req.headers;
if (!authorization) {
return res.status(401).json({ message: "Authorization header missing" });
}

const token = authorization.split(" ")[1];
try {
const decoded = jwt.verify(token, process.env.JWT_SECRET);
req.user = decoded;
// Proceed with the request
} catch (error) {
return res.status(401).json({ message: "Invalid token" });
}
}
import jwt from "jsonwebtoken";

export default function handler(req, res) {
const { authorization } = req.headers;
if (!authorization) {
return res.status(401).json({ message: "Authorization header missing" });
}

const token = authorization.split(" ")[1];
try {
const decoded = jwt.verify(token, process.env.JWT_SECRET);
req.user = decoded;
// Proceed with the request
} catch (error) {
return res.status(401).json({ message: "Invalid token" });
}
}
5 replies
RRefine
Created by unwilling-turquoise on 11/18/2024 in #ask-any-question
auth0 error 401 unauthorized from backend
Hi @Agil. I'm kapa.ai, your friendly support bot. I will try to answer your question by searching through the knowledge base. :wave:
5 replies
RRefine
Created by sensitive-blue on 11/18/2024 in #ask-any-question
How can I integrate refine with strapi v5?
4 replies
RRefine
Created by cloudy-cyan on 11/18/2024 in #ask-any-question
How can I integrate refine with strapi v5?
---------------------- Hmm, I do not have enough information to answer your question about integrating refine with Strapi v5 specifically. The knowledge sources provided only contain information about integrating refine with Strapi v4, but not v5. Without confirmed details about Strapi v5 compatibility, I cannot provide an accurate answer about how to integrate it with refine. If you have a question about integrating refine with Strapi v4, I would be happy to assist with that based on the available information. ---------------------- Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon: ----------------------
4 replies
RRefine
Created by like-gold on 11/18/2024 in #ask-any-question
How can I integrate refine with strapi v5?
Hi @tingadev. I'm kapa.ai, your friendly support bot. I will try to answer your question by searching through the knowledge base. :wave:
4 replies
RRefine
Created by deep-jade on 11/10/2024 in #ask-any-question
Saving
53 replies
RRefine
Created by noble-gold on 11/10/2024 in #ask-any-question
Saving
import { Refine, Authenticated } from "@refinedev/core";
import { BrowserRouter, Routes, Route, Outlet } from "react-router-dom";
import { AuthPage } from "@refinedev/antd";

const App = () => {
return (
<BrowserRouter>
<Refine
authProvider={authProvider}
// ... other props
>
<Routes>
<Route
element={
<Authenticated fallback={<Outlet />}>
<Outlet />
</Authenticated>
}
>
{/* Your authenticated routes */}
</Route>
<Route
element={
<Authenticated fallback={<Outlet />}>
<NavigateToResource />
</Authenticated>
}
>
<Route path="/login" element={<AuthPage type="login" />} />
</Route>
</Routes>
</Refine>
</BrowserRouter>
);
};
import { Refine, Authenticated } from "@refinedev/core";
import { BrowserRouter, Routes, Route, Outlet } from "react-router-dom";
import { AuthPage } from "@refinedev/antd";

const App = () => {
return (
<BrowserRouter>
<Refine
authProvider={authProvider}
// ... other props
>
<Routes>
<Route
element={
<Authenticated fallback={<Outlet />}>
<Outlet />
</Authenticated>
}
>
{/* Your authenticated routes */}
</Route>
<Route
element={
<Authenticated fallback={<Outlet />}>
<NavigateToResource />
</Authenticated>
}
>
<Route path="/login" element={<AuthPage type="login" />} />
</Route>
</Routes>
</Refine>
</BrowserRouter>
);
};
This setup ensures that when a user reopens the browser and tries to access an authenticated route, the check method in your authProvider will be called. If it returns authenticated: false, the user will be redirected to the login page Routing documentation (https://refine.dev/docs/routing/integrations/react-router/#how-to-handle-optional-authentication-redirects-and-layouts-with-authentication). Remember to adjust the token storage and verification logic according to your specific authentication system. The key is to implement a robust check method in your authProvider that accurately determines if the user's session is still valid when the browser is reopened. ---------------------- Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon: ----------------------
53 replies
RRefine
Created by like-gold on 11/10/2024 in #ask-any-question
Saving
---------------------- To handle the scenario where you want to redirect users to the login page when they reopen the browser in a refine application, you need to implement this behavior in your authProvider. Specifically, you'll need to focus on the check method of the authProvider. Here's how you can implement this: 1. In your authProvider, modify the check method to verify if the user's session is still valid:
import { AuthProvider } from "@refinedev/core";

export const authProvider: AuthProvider = {
// ... other methods

check: async () => {
// Check if there's a valid token or session
const token = localStorage.getItem("auth_token");

if (token) {
// Verify if the token is still valid
// This could involve checking the token's expiration or making an API call
const isTokenValid = await verifyToken(token);

if (isTokenValid) {
return {
authenticated: true,
};
}
}

// If there's no token or it's invalid, redirect to login
return {
authenticated: false,
redirectTo: "/login",
error: {
message: "Please login to continue",
name: "Authentication Error",
},
};
},

// ... other methods
};
import { AuthProvider } from "@refinedev/core";

export const authProvider: AuthProvider = {
// ... other methods

check: async () => {
// Check if there's a valid token or session
const token = localStorage.getItem("auth_token");

if (token) {
// Verify if the token is still valid
// This could involve checking the token's expiration or making an API call
const isTokenValid = await verifyToken(token);

if (isTokenValid) {
return {
authenticated: true,
};
}
}

// If there's no token or it's invalid, redirect to login
return {
authenticated: false,
redirectTo: "/login",
error: {
message: "Please login to continue",
name: "Authentication Error",
},
};
},

// ... other methods
};
In this example, the check method looks for a token in localStorage. If it finds one, it verifies if the token is still valid (you'll need to implement the verifyToken function based on your authentication system). If the token is invalid or doesn't exist, it returns an object that tells refine to redirect to the login page Auth Provider documentation (https://refine.dev/docs/guides-concepts/usage-with-existing-projects/#check-method). 2. Make sure you've set up your routes correctly, wrapping authenticated routes with the <Authenticated> component:
53 replies
RRefine
Created by adverse-sapphire on 11/10/2024 in #ask-any-question
Saving
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books:
53 replies
RRefine
Created by vicious-gold on 11/15/2024 in #ask-any-question
how to specity types for post and also return data on useForm and useModalForm
4 replies
RRefine
Created by other-emerald on 11/15/2024 in #ask-any-question
how to specity types for post and also return data on useForm and useModalForm
---------------------- To specify types for both the form data (POST) and return data when using useForm and useModalForm in refine, you can utilize generic type parameters. Here's how you can do it: For useForm:
const { formProps, saveButtonProps, onFinish } = useForm<TData, TError, TVariables>();
const { formProps, saveButtonProps, onFinish } = useForm<TData, TError, TVariables>();
For useModalForm:
const { formProps, saveButtonProps, onFinish } = useModalForm<TData, TError, TVariables>();
const { formProps, saveButtonProps, onFinish } = useModalForm<TData, TError, TVariables>();
Where: - TData: The type of data returned from the API - TError: The type of error returned from the API (usually HttpError) - TVariables: The type of data sent to the API (your form structure) Here's a more concrete example:
interface User {
id: number;
name: string;
email: string;
}

interface UserForm {
name: string;
email: string;
}

const { formProps, saveButtonProps, onFinish } = useForm<User, HttpError, UserForm>();
interface User {
id: number;
name: string;
email: string;
}

interface UserForm {
name: string;
email: string;
}

const { formProps, saveButtonProps, onFinish } = useForm<User, HttpError, UserForm>();
In this example, User is the type of data returned from the API, HttpError is the error type, and UserForm is the structure of your form data. The onFinish function will have the type:
(values: UserForm) => Promise<CreateResponse<User> | UpdateResponse<User> | void>
(values: UserForm) => Promise<CreateResponse<User> | UpdateResponse<User> | void>
This approach allows you to have type safety for both the form data you're submitting and the data you're receiving from the API. useForm API Reference (https://refine.dev/docs/packages/react-hook-form/use-form/#api) useModalForm Return Values (https://refine.dev/docs/ui-integrations/mantine/hooks/use-modal-form/#return-values-1) Remember that the exact implementation might vary slightly depending on your specific refine setup and version. ---------------------- Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon: ----------------------
4 replies
RRefine
Created by conscious-sapphire on 11/15/2024 in #ask-any-question
how to specity types for post and also return data on useForm and useModalForm
Hi @Joe Gaffney. I'm kapa.ai, your friendly support bot. I will try to answer your question by searching through the knowledge base. :wave:
4 replies
RRefine
Created by xenial-black on 11/15/2024 in #ask-any-question
accessControlProvider multi level resources
5 replies
RRefine
Created by wise-white on 11/15/2024 in #ask-any-question
accessControlProvider multi level resources
Remember to adjust your policy definitions and the can method implementation according to your specific needs and the access control library you're using. Access Control Provider (https://refine.dev/docs/authorization/access-control-provider/) provides more detailed information on implementing access control in refine. ---------------------- Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon: ----------------------
5 replies
RRefine
Created by rival-black on 11/15/2024 in #ask-any-question
accessControlProvider multi level resources
---------------------- To filter access to all resources belonging to one parent resource using the accessControlProvider in refine, you can implement a hierarchical or nested structure in your access control policies. Here's how you can approach this: 1. Define your resources with a hierarchical structure in your policies. 2. In the can method of your accessControlProvider, implement logic to check access based on the resource hierarchy. Here's an example of how you might structure your can method:
accessControlProvider: {
can: async ({ resource, action, params }) => {
const enforcer = await newEnforcer(model, adapter);

// Split the resource into its hierarchical parts
const resourceParts = resource.split('/');

// Check access for each level of the resource hierarchy
for (let i = 1; i <= resourceParts.length; i++) {
const resourceToCheck = resourceParts.slice(0, i).join('/');
const can = await enforcer.enforce(role, resourceToCheck, action);

if (!can) {
return { can: false };
}
}

return { can: true };
},
}
accessControlProvider: {
can: async ({ resource, action, params }) => {
const enforcer = await newEnforcer(model, adapter);

// Split the resource into its hierarchical parts
const resourceParts = resource.split('/');

// Check access for each level of the resource hierarchy
for (let i = 1; i <= resourceParts.length; i++) {
const resourceToCheck = resourceParts.slice(0, i).join('/');
const can = await enforcer.enforce(role, resourceToCheck, action);

if (!can) {
return { can: false };
}
}

return { can: true };
},
}
In this approach, you split the resource into its hierarchical parts and check access for each level. If access is denied at any level, the overall access is denied. For example, if you have a resource structure like posts/comments/replies, the can method will check access for posts, then posts/comments, and finally posts/comments/replies. You would then need to define your policies accordingly, for example:
p, admin, posts, (list)|(create)
p, admin, posts/*, (edit)|(show)|(delete)
p, admin, posts/comments, (list)|(create)
p, admin, posts/comments/*, (edit)|(show)|(delete)
p, admin, posts, (list)|(create)
p, admin, posts/*, (edit)|(show)|(delete)
p, admin, posts/comments, (list)|(create)
p, admin, posts/comments/*, (edit)|(show)|(delete)
This approach allows you to control access at different levels of your resource hierarchy.
5 replies